{"id":7797,"date":"2023-08-03T06:43:00","date_gmt":"2023-08-03T06:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/newsite\/?p=7797"},"modified":"2023-08-03T07:04:17","modified_gmt":"2023-08-03T07:04:17","slug":"the-nine-days-retreat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/sangha-admin\/the-nine-days-retreat\/","title":{"rendered":"The nine days retreat"},"content":{"rendered":"<h6><\/h6>\n<h6>The nine days retreat was a profound experience. I had a really good time. The<br \/>\nmain theme was explorations of anatta but there were beautiful openings in<br \/>\nsamadhi, and interestingly without intentionally choosing so, the last two days<br \/>\nwere very imaginal.<\/h6>\n<h6>I &#8211; Anatta:<\/h6>\n<h6>I started by visiting each aggregate relaxing both identification and<br \/>\nappropriation. When the experience did not relax or fade, I used analytical<br \/>\nreasonings to incline the citta towards a fully sustained anatta view<br \/>\n(impermanent, not in my full control, just a perception, fabricated because<br \/>\ndependent on clinging).<\/h6>\n<h6>In the past, I had focused mostly on identification (not self) and you invited<br \/>\nme last summer to investigate appropriation (not mine) in more depth. Relaxing<br \/>\nappropriation worked particularly well for objects that were felt as external<br \/>\n(sights and sounds) because the citta seems to reify them more as belonging to<br \/>\nthe self than as part of the self. The dukkha associated with appropriation<br \/>\ncould be felt and released. Particularly when contemplating nature with eye and<br \/>\near, freeing a percept from the self increased its beauty and vibrance. Also<br \/>\nlooking at my loved ones through the lens of anatta brought a strong sense of<br \/>\nfreedom and love. I also started practicing in a receptive mode: in each<br \/>\narising perception, the object can be seen as not mine, subject as not self, and<br \/>\nthe action (such as seeing) as not mine. Seeing intentions, actions, and<br \/>\nmovements of the attention as not self was also incredibly beautiful and<br \/>\nfreeing. The interaction between anatta, clinging and the fading of perception<br \/>\nwas clear on every aggregate and sense sphere.<\/h6>\n<h6>A very significant discovery was seeing clearly that when anatta is applied<br \/>\non seeing, hearing, feeling, then the sense of the watcher in each sense sphere<br \/>\ndissolves and at the end this unfolds in a way of looking where there is no<br \/>\ncenter: vastness of awareness. Vastness of awareness had opened in previous<br \/>\nretreats and it had become my main practice in previous years. But my<br \/>\nunderstanding of the state was incomplete and I could not go further. That&#8217;s<br \/>\nwhere you started working with me on one on one. Because vastness had opened,<br \/>\nmy understanding of anatta came mostly from vastness of awareness (just a<br \/>\nperception) and not the other way around. Making the trip the other way from<br \/>\nanatta to vastness of awareness step by step and working on each sense sphere,<br \/>\nincreased my understanding of the state, why it does open, and why the<br \/>\nbackground feels as conscience. I understand what has to be removed from the<br \/>\n&#8220;usual&#8221; selfing state to go to vastness of awareness; and that is a sense of a<br \/>\ncenter \/ discrete watcher in all sense spheres. I&#8217;m very happy because my<br \/>\nunderstanding of both anatta and vastness of awareness are much more precise and<br \/>\nI can clearly discriminate and identify their particularities.<\/h6>\n<h6>This paved the way to a second important insight: before I was reifying<br \/>\nconsciousness as something containing experience. By seeing how vastness of<br \/>\nawareness could be arrived at by dissolving the sense of the observer; and<br \/>\nseeing the background as &#8220;just another perception&#8221;; I realized I was fabricating<br \/>\na big idea about consciousness which was not there. It became possible to<br \/>\ncontemplate consciousness as just the knowing of a perception and the knowing<br \/>\nof knowing. Then the citta intuitively understood the co-arising between<br \/>\nperception and consciousness: one cannot exist without the other.<\/h6>\n<h6>This brought a lot of freedom and much understanding: it clarified the<br \/>\naggregates of perception and consciousness which were still a bit unclear for<br \/>\nme; it allowed to see consciousness as &#8220;just knowing&#8221; which made it less solid.<br \/>\nOne interesting side effect is that it removed my fear of the anicca practice.<br \/>\nBefore, I was afraid of anicca practice and tended to avoid it: in particular<br \/>\nfast anicca where everything becomes vibratory and there are gaps in experience.<br \/>\nRealizing the inseparability of consciousness and perception made anicca<br \/>\nperfectly ok; there was no \u00ab big consciousness \u00bb that was going to be destroyed<br \/>\nin the gaps. It allowed a beautiful way of looking where<br \/>\nconsciousness\/world\/self is born and dies hundreds of times a second at every<br \/>\narising and passing away. Rob warns in his book that this view is provisional<br \/>\nbecause it reifies time, yet it felt very profound and beautiful. As a result,<br \/>\nthe fear of anhilation in anicca practice is gone and fear of death seems also<br \/>\nweakened: nothing mine will be lost and I&#8217;m already dying all the time. After<br \/>\nthis view arose, I felt fearlessly equanimous.<\/h6>\n<h6>II &#8211; Samadhi:<\/h6>\n<h6>I used peace, joy and less fabrication as a guiding compass for correct<br \/>\npractice. So whenever, the citta became attached or agitated, I practiced<br \/>\nsamadhi sometimes introducing a flavor or intention of metta. Because it was<br \/>\nseen as a side practice, there was no pressure to perform. This<br \/>\nallowed the samadhi to flower beautifully. During the retreat, I could revisit<br \/>\njhanas one and two which I know well and can reenter by recalling their felt<br \/>\nsense. Jhana three is also accessible sometimes, I should spend more time to<br \/>\nfamiliarize myself with it. There were some experimentations in entering first<br \/>\njhana through other sense doors; in particular sounds (fun) or sight (much much<br \/>\npowerful for me than body jhana, but did not pursue it because I became<br \/>\nover-energized and manic for the next walking period). Mostly I practiced with<br \/>\nthe breath and the body. I understand better now the movement of rest and<br \/>\nrelaxation that can be found in the jhanas; how each one is more subtle and more<br \/>\ncalming for the citta. In the middle of the retreat, it became clear that the citta<br \/>\naspired to more and more calm states, and both vipassana and samadhi were leading there<br \/>\nand seen as a movement towards rest.<\/h6>\n<h6>Sometimes during samadhi, I used anatta to relax and unbind objects that were<br \/>\nperceived as dukkha. At some point this opened a new state, much much much more<br \/>\nrestful than previous jhanas. This was new to me, there was a sense of &#8220;WOW&#8221;. It<br \/>\nopened after I had dissolved the sense spheres and had let go the remanents of<br \/>\nthe sense of the body, I had to let go deeply of control; the state was not<br \/>\n&#8220;perfect&#8221; (some of the sense spheres were not completely faded) but it was a<br \/>\nprofound experience. After checking Rob&#8217;s book, it could be the fifth jhana. I<br \/>\njust stayed a few moments and got out into another jhana which I could not<br \/>\nidentify well (maybe four ? there was a sense of perfect neutrality). The after<br \/>\neffect during the next walking period was one of perfection: everything seemed<br \/>\ncrystal clear and perfect as it was.<\/h6>\n<h6>III &#8211; Images:<\/h6>\n<h6>This report is too clinical to do justice to the imaginal play of shadows that<br \/>\nhappened in the last two days. I think after much shunyata, so much<br \/>\nunbinding, the citta wanted to bind. There was a balancing movement towards form.<br \/>\nI will only speak of one of the images which visited me, it&#8217;s a familiar image,<br \/>\nprimal, it smells of earth and blood, a powerful lion that comes from times<br \/>\nbefore the words were spoken. This time it arose from deep down the belly,<br \/>\nroaring, taking control of my mouth and biting through me. With it came a demand<br \/>\nfor expression, creation, and strong sexual desires.<br \/>\nI did not feel respectful to the image to repress the sexual desires in classic<br \/>\n&#8220;Theravada&#8221; fashion, yet I was still in retreat under nine precepts. Because<br \/>\nthe anatta way of looking was powerful, I just gave full autonomy to the image:<br \/>\nnot me, not mine. In particular, the sexual desires could be both accepted and<br \/>\nseen as not mine. This was powerful because the desire\/image &#8220;resolved&#8221; itself<br \/>\nimaginally, it played its act, manifested its essence, and then unbinded.<br \/>\nDuring the explorations with the sense of appropriation, I sometimes played<br \/>\naround switching the sense of object and subject (which is a fun experiment).<br \/>\nDuring the retreat I understood that we can do the same with images:<\/h6>\n<h6>either we see the image as ours; I have such familiar<br \/>\nimages that arise sometimes and that I see as a part of my psyche.<br \/>\neither we see the image as not ours, fully autonomous, which can lead to what<br \/>\nhappened above.<br \/>\na third possibility which feels powerful and I want to try, giving ourselves<br \/>\nto the image. Because self is fabricated we can see ourselves as belonging to the image.<\/h6>\n<p>Views: 60<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The nine days retreat was a profound experience. I had a really good time. The main theme was explorations of anatta but there were beautiful openings in samadhi, and interestingly without intentionally choosing so, the last two days were very imaginal. I &#8211; Anatta: I started by visiting each aggregate relaxing both identification and appropriation. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":7479,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-retreats"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7797\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opensanghafoundation.org\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}